Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2000 21:00:40 -1000 (HST) From: Brian <dream@inferno.hi.vizip.com> To: Wes Peters <wes@softweyr.com> Cc: Warner Losh <imp@village.org>, security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Streem.c Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.10.10001272056180.9320-100000@inferno.hi.vizip.com> In-Reply-To: <38913D8C.50A1EF09@softweyr.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Yup Wes, I installed the patch on one machine (3.4 -STABLE), and ran stream.c against it from another fbsd machine on our LAN. I had "top" open on the machine being attacked and the CPU never seemed to drop below 99.6% idle. However, when I installed the same patch on a 3.3 -STABLE machine and ran stream.c against it the CPU immediately droped below 80% percent idle. Is that patch designed for all versions of STABLE or just 3.4 ? --Brian On Thu, 27 Jan 2000, Wes Peters wrote: > Warner Losh wrote: > > > > In message <NDBBKIFNGKHJLHKHOILGEECACMAA.nblasgen@refract.com> "Nicholas W. Blasgen" writes: > > : Where can I find an (un)official patch for this stream.c bug that BugTraq > > : has been covering. I just joined the list today, so sorry if you have > > : already said. > > > > Something will likely be committed to -current or -stable. > > Speaking of which, has anyone had an opportunity to test or examine the patch > for -stable I posted yesterday? My machines seem to be still running after > 24 hours, and talking on the network. > > -- > "Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?" > > Wes Peters Softweyr LLC > wes@softweyr.com http://softweyr.com/ > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.10.10001272056180.9320-100000>