Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2016 00:17:16 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 208343] [em] wake on lan not working with Intel I219 V2 Message-ID: <bug-208343-8-NCyapWLviO@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-208343-8@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-208343-8@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208343 --- Comment #4 from Eric van Gyzen <vangyzen@freebsd.org> --- I get the same behavior as Guido. I'm running head r297219 (24 March) on a Dell XPS 8900 with an onboard NIC. To send the WOL packet, I run this on a neighboring 10.2-RELEASE machine: wake bridge0 64:00:6a:80:be:cd As I mentioned in the mail thread: In em_get_wakeup(), the eeprom_data is zero, so adapter->wol stays zero, so ifconfig doesn't show any WOL capabilities. When I ignore the eeprom_data by commenting out the "if" condition, WOL capabilities appear in ifconfig. However, even when I enable WOL with ifconfig, WOL still doesn't work after a "shutdown -p now". em0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500 options=4219b<RXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,VLAN_HWCSUM,TSO4,WOL_MAGIC,VLAN_HWTSO> ether 64:00:6a:80:be:cd inet a.b.c.d netmask 0xffffff80 broadcast e.f.g.h nd6 options=29<PERFORMNUD,IFDISABLED,AUTO_LINKLOCAL> media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT <full-duplex>) status: active em0@pci0:0:31:6: class=0x020000 card=0x06b81028 chip=0x15b88086 rev=0x31 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = 'Ethernet Connection (2) I219-V' class = network subclass = ethernet smbios.system.maker="Dell Inc." smbios.system.product="XPS 8900" smbios.bios.reldate="11/12/2015" smbios.bios.version="2.1.0" -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-208343-8-NCyapWLviO>