Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2026 14:16:58 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Fernando_Apestegu=C3=ADa?= <fernape@freebsd.org> To: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@freebsd.org> Cc: Max Brazhnikov <makc@freebsd.org>, "ports-committers@FreeBSD.org" <ports-committers@freebsd.org>, dev-commits-ports-all@freebsd.org, dev-commits-ports-main@freebsd.org Subject: Re: git: 8bd89ab595cb - main - deskutils/qownnotes: the port had been updated to version 26.3.3 Message-ID: <CAGwOe2aurhDxs=OhoMXYk-TOS3gnS-755mxpemTZWdq-WaSWzA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <aa7DIeDZbiQI19cM@FreeBSD.org> References: <69aa7cc7.1e357.86a2325@gitrepo.freebsd.org> <2436078.THHZn3L5Ee@mercury> <aa6fH4YnuZNKBRcH@FreeBSD.org> <2282905.PLFibm3KWW@mercury> <aa7DIeDZbiQI19cM@FreeBSD.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] El lun, 9 mar 2026, 13:55, Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@freebsd.org> escribió: > On Mon, Mar 09, 2026 at 02:02:56PM +0300, Max Brazhnikov wrote: > > On Mon, 9 Mar 2026 10:21:19 +0000 Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 09, 2026 at 12:00:26PM +0300, Max Brazhnikov wrote: > > > > Hi Alexey, > > > > > commit 8bd89ab595cb9f03ab29068b1a0c08795d438781 > > > > [...] > > > > Is maintainer still active? > > > > > > No, they haven't submitted or reacted to PRs for years. > > > > Well, I suggest you to take maintainership or reset the port. > > Perhaps I will, although I don't see much value in doing so. > To me, inactive maintainer is as good as ports@. > Not really. For someone not aware of this issue, he/she will try to contact maintainer if there is an email address in MAINTAINER, which will lead to delays and frustration. With ports@ in MAINTAINER it is clear no individual is taking care of the port... Except you are which leads to the conclusion that it is probably best that you become the maintainer so reality and expectations are aligned :-) > > You did not answer my other question :) > > I don't remember if I even heard from maintainer, you may consider > this as timeout or implict approval, I'm indifferent here. > > ./danfe > > [-- Attachment #2 --] <div dir="auto"><div><br><br><div class="gmail_quote gmail_quote_container"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">El lun, 9 mar 2026, 13:55, Alexey Dokuchaev <<a href="mailto:danfe@freebsd.org">danfe@freebsd.org</a>> escribió:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">On Mon, Mar 09, 2026 at 02:02:56PM +0300, Max Brazhnikov wrote:<br> > On Mon, 9 Mar 2026 10:21:19 +0000 Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:<br> > > On Mon, Mar 09, 2026 at 12:00:26PM +0300, Max Brazhnikov wrote:<br> > > > Hi Alexey,<br> > > > > commit 8bd89ab595cb9f03ab29068b1a0c08795d438781<br> > > > [...]<br> > > > Is maintainer still active?<br> > > <br> > > No, they haven't submitted or reacted to PRs for years.<br> > <br> > Well, I suggest you to take maintainership or reset the port.<br> <br> Perhaps I will, although I don't see much value in doing so.<br> To me, inactive maintainer is as good as ports@.<br></blockquote></div></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Not really. For someone not aware of this issue, he/she will try to contact maintainer if there is an email address in MAINTAINER, which will lead to delays and frustration. With ports@ in MAINTAINER it is clear no individual is taking care of the port... Except you are which leads to the conclusion that it is probably best that you become the maintainer so reality and expectations are aligned :-)</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto"><div class="gmail_quote gmail_quote_container"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"> <br> > You did not answer my other question :)<br> <br> I don't remember if I even heard from maintainer, you may consider<br> this as timeout or implict approval, I'm indifferent here.<br> <br> ./danfe<br> <br> </blockquote></div></div></div>home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAGwOe2aurhDxs=OhoMXYk-TOS3gnS-755mxpemTZWdq-WaSWzA>