Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2006 10:23:24 +0100 From: Divacky Roman <xdivac02@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> To: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: LDFLAGS setting Message-ID: <20060221092324.GA23739@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> In-Reply-To: <20060220174250.GA35343@flame.pc> References: <20060220172730.GA61906@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> <20060220174250.GA35343@flame.pc>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 07:42:50PM +0200, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > On 2006-02-20 18:27, Divacky Roman <xdivac02@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> wrote: > > hi > > > > is is possible to set global LDFLAGS as its possible with CFLAGS? > > Yes, but why would you want to do this? It is very likely to create > dependencies with libraries that are not really used by all programs. I was just curious. man ld promises some optimizations and thats what I am interested in: LDFLAGS=-O1 --sort-common -z combreloc --relax but this doesnt seem to work with autoconf :( roman
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060221092324.GA23739>