Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 02:12:25 +0200 From: Michael Nottebrock <michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> To: Colin Percival <colin.percival@wadham.ox.ac.uk>, FreeBSD Security <freebsd-security@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: xdelta files for security patches Message-ID: <200305130212.26302.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <5.0.2.1.1.20030513001702.02e4a018@popserver.sfu.ca> References: <5.0.2.1.1.20030513001702.02e4a018@popserver.sfu.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Boundary-02=_qhDw+lzlyu6OYlS Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Description: signed data Content-Disposition: inline On Tuesday 13 May 2003 01:35, Colin Percival wrote: > At 01:04 13/05/2003 +0200, Michael Nottebrock wrote: > >Has xdelta (in ports under misc/xdelta) ever been considered as a means = of > >delivering binary patches for security updates? > > > >It seems to be a pretty neat. > > Using some form of binary diffs is on my todo list for FreeBSD Update > (security/freebsd-update) As an embarrassing matter of fact, I totally forgot about your work. Thanks= =20 for reminding me! =2D-=20 Regards, Michael Nottebrock --Boundary-02=_qhDw+lzlyu6OYlS Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQA+wDhqXhc68WspdLARAgcTAJ42tu4ULrvonD1ATmWkKT9W6gwuhwCeM6+8 aRrLyIsLLgDjA8VDpJpijUw= =qhG0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Boundary-02=_qhDw+lzlyu6OYlS--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200305130212.26302.michaelnottebrock>