Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1999 11:56:20 -0000 From: paul@originative.co.uk To: danny@sydney.alpha.net.au, paul@originative.co.uk Cc: asmodai@wxs.nl, opsys@open-systems.net, freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: RE: QUESTION: FBSD + SQUID or FBSD + APACHE? Message-ID: <A6D02246E1ABD2119F5200C0F0303D10FDC3@OCTOPUS>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> -----Original Message----- > From: Dan [mailto:danny@sydney.alpha.net.au] > Sent: Thursday, January 21, 1999 2:50 AM > To: paul@originative.co.uk > Cc: asmodai@wxs.nl; opsys@open-systems.net; freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG > Subject: RE: QUESTION: FBSD + SQUID or FBSD + APACHE? > > > Hi, I have worked with IIS for some time now and I have > experienced many > problems. Like the blue screen of death after u deployed ur > webserver .. > > Plus many more ture stories how NT screwed up some mission critcal > projects > > If I was you Paul I would completely forget about Nt Ehh? I've never, ever said anything in favour of NT! Please, don't besmirch my character in such a manner :-) You've removed all the context but if this is in reference to the proposal to move a site from NT to FreeBSD I just suggested that the content of the site be checked first before pushing his boss to adopt FreeBSD since if the content uses a lot of IIS features the Web applications themselves will need rewriting, it won't just be a simple matter of changing web server. I never meant to imply that moving to FreeBSD wouldn't be a good idea, it just might be more work than they realise. Beneficial in the long wrong though for sure but probably a lot harder to justify to management. Paul. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?A6D02246E1ABD2119F5200C0F0303D10FDC3>