Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 15:46:52 -0400 From: "Kevin K" <kkutzko@teksavvy.com> To: "'Jeremy Chadwick'" <koitsu@freebsd.org>, "'Marko Lerota'" <mlerota@iskon.hr> Cc: 'Kris Kennaway' <kris@FreeBSD.org>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Upgrading to 7.0 - stupid requirements Message-ID: <000401c889f9$fab77c10$f0267430$@com> In-Reply-To: <20080319193243.GA30784@eos.sc1.parodius.com> References: <867igo3cih.fsf@zid.claresco.hr> <47C749CF.4010501@FreeBSD.org> <86eja7et3j.fsf@zid.claresco.hr> <47E0249C.8030700@FreeBSD.org> <868x0ezh9u.fsf@zid.claresco.hr> <20080319193243.GA30784@eos.sc1.parodius.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> That said: I do understand what you're saying, and yes, I can see why > you would want that. It does make sense, and it's reasonable. It's > just hard to achieve. I don't think other mainstream OSes (e.g. Linux) > offer this ability either, though. Am I wrong? Redhat's up2date/yum ? I'm not 100% certain though.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?000401c889f9$fab77c10$f0267430$>