Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 15 Aug 2007 23:52:26 +0800
From:      "Rong-en Fan" <grafan@gmail.com>
To:        "Max Laier" <max@love2party.net>
Cc:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
Subject:   Re: panic: sleeping thread owns a non-sleepable lock
Message-ID:  <6eb82e0708150852t354e0a55h674d168ccee1f750@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <200708112129.29751.max@love2party.net>
References:  <6eb82e0708111122g7e36b725h19ede889e4bbc9d6@mail.gmail.com> <20070811191835.GA28716@rot26.obsecurity.org> <200708112129.29751.max@love2party.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 8/12/07, Max Laier <max@love2party.net> wrote:
> On Saturday 11 August 2007, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 02:22:35AM +0800, Rong-en Fan wrote:
> > > I'm running 7.0-CURRENT as of  yesterday, and it's very easy
> > > to make it panic:
> > >
> > > Sleeping thread (tid 100065, pid 1066) owns a non-sleepable lock
> > > sched_switch(c50a1600,0,1,1c7a7e4,4217e5,...) at sched_switch+0x190
> > > mi_switch(1,0) at mi_switch+0x13f
> > > sleepq_switch(c50a1600,0,c078a4e2,21b,c07e3820,...) at
> > > sleepq_switch+0x87 sleepq_wait(c07e3820,0,c0770b7e,3,0,...) at
> > > sleepq_wait+0x36 _sx_xlock_hard(c07e3820,c50a1600,0,0,0,...) at
> > > _sx_xlock_hard+0x21d
> > > fr_checknatout(f9c7a8d0,f9c7a8cc,64,c57ad900,c4de7400,...) at
> > > fr_checknatout+0x29d
> > > fr_check(c8cc4644,14,c4de7400,1,f9c7a9b4,...) at fr_check+0x9b1
> > > fr_check_wrapper(0,f9c7a9b4,c4de7400,2,c54dab28,...) at
> > > fr_check_wrapper+0x3f
> > > pfil_run_hooks(c08057c0,f9c7aa4c,c4de7400,2,c54dab28,...) at
> > > pfil_run_hooks+0x74 ip_output(c8cc4600,0,f9c7aa10,0,0,...) at
> > > ip_output+0x913
> > > tcp_output(cae322d0,cb277200,0,0,0,...) at tcp_output+0x1106
> > > tcp_usr_send(c51e7318,0,cb277200,0,0,...) at tcp_usr_send+0x240
> > > kern_sendfile(c50a1600,f9c7acfc,0,0,0,...) at kern_sendfile+0x1037
> > > sendfile(c50a1600,f9c7acfc,20,16,f9c7ad2c,...) at sendfile+0xa8
> > > syscall(f9c7ad38) at syscall+0x315
> > > Xint0x80_syscall() at Xint0x80_syscall+0x20
> > > --- syscall (393, FreeBSD ELF32, sendfile), eip = 0x28290bff, esp =
> > > 0xbfbfc6ac, ebp = 0xbfbfe718 ---
> >
> > What is the lock it holds, and where is it acquired?
>
> My bet is on the pfil rwlock - accquired in pfil_run_hooks and tcbinfo /
> inp mtxs from tcp_output.  Nothing in the transmission path must use sx
> locks.  I keep on telling that.

I compiled kernel with WITNESS and INVARIANTS as in GENERIC.
After boot, without doing anything (I even set ipnat_enable="NO", i.e.
only ipfw is running, but ipf/ipnat is compiled in). I got panic.
I don't have serial console attached, but the console screen is at

http://www.rafan.org/tmp/pfil_panic.jpg

You can find 'show locks', 'show allpcpu', and 'show lock' for each
lock. Also two trace for thread that are found in 'show allpcpu'.

If necessary, I can setup serial console, but it will take few days.

Hope this helps,
Rong-En Fan

>
> --
> /"\  Best regards,                      | mlaier@freebsd.org
> \ /  Max Laier                          | ICQ #67774661
>  X   http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/  | mlaier@EFnet
> / \  ASCII Ribbon Campaign              | Against HTML Mail and News
>
>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6eb82e0708150852t354e0a55h674d168ccee1f750>