Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2023 12:44:17 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: virtualization@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 273557] Regression preventing bhyve from running inside a jail without IP after f74147e26999838e03a522bf59ea33bef470d356) breaks support for jailing bhyve with IPv4 and IPv6 disabled. Patch included. Message-ID: <bug-273557-27103-yrmFLBMqhZ@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-273557-27103@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-273557-27103@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D273557 --- Comment #14 from Mark Johnston <markj@FreeBSD.org> --- (In reply to crest from comment #13) > Netlink sockets shouldn't offer any way for a bhyve process attached to a= vnet enabled jail to even address network interface in its parent jail (no= rmally the unjailed host) to bring it up (or down). I don't believe I claimed otherwise? I thought this bug report was about classic jails. I'm ok with committing a patch to use the /dev/tap ioctl. Let's wait for a= bit to see if Bjoern has any further comments. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-273557-27103-yrmFLBMqhZ>