Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2001 20:52:13 -0600 From: Warner Losh <imp@harmony.village.org> To: lists <lists@security.za.net> Cc: Mike Smith <msmith@freebsd.org>, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NewCard / pccbb Message-ID: <200108060252.f762qD103042@harmony.village.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 06 Aug 2001 04:26:57 %2B0200." <Pine.BSF.4.21.0108060425330.66904-100000@security.za.net> References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0108060425330.66904-100000@security.za.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <Pine.BSF.4.21.0108060425330.66904-100000@security.za.net> lists writes: : I tried your suggestion below, and for some reason its still assigning the : same interrupt (whichever one I pick) to both the network card and the : wavelan card, and interstingly enough even if I remove one of them, its : still trying to get a routeable interrupt and the wavelan still doesnt : work. Any way that I can get this thing to give me a straight interrupt : on all cards without trying to do funny irq routing? Unlike the ISA world, it is OK to use the same IRQ in the pci world. Of course, Mike will have to say if this is sane considering your PIR table. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200108060252.f762qD103042>