Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 23:57:43 +0200 From: Jilles Tjoelker <jilles@stack.nl> To: Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r209595 - head/sys/kern Message-ID: <20100629215743.GA68788@stack.nl> In-Reply-To: <20100629210522.GY2179@hoeg.nl> References: <201006292044.o5TKiJd7031766@svn.freebsd.org> <20100629210522.GY2179@hoeg.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 11:05:22PM +0200, Ed Schouten wrote: > * John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > > Log: > > Send SIGPIPE to the thread that issued the offending system call > > rather than to the entire process. > Should something similar be used inside the TTY layer, where > reads/writes may cause signals to be generated? SIGTTIN and SIGTTOU from read/write/ioctl are sent to the entire process group and are therefore not sent to a specific thread. -- Jilles Tjoelker
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100629215743.GA68788>