Date: Sat, 25 Apr 1998 17:01:08 -0500 (EST) From: John Fieber <jfieber@indiana.edu> To: "John S. Dyson" <toor@dyson.iquest.net> Cc: cschuber@uumail.gov.bc.ca, peter.jeremy@alcatel.com.au, freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Static vs. dynamic linking Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980425165739.24681B-100000@fallout.campusview.indiana.edu> In-Reply-To: <199804251741.MAA11634@dyson.iquest.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 25 Apr 1998, John S. Dyson wrote: > I would suggest that it is probably best not to link with 50 > shared libs, but with only one vs. 2-3, it is best to go all of > the way, and link with all three shared. That reminds me...Microsoft Internet Explorer for Solaris comes with a whopping 51 shared libraries. They seem to be trying to inflict all dimensions of DLL Hell (tm) on Unix as well... -john To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.980425165739.24681B-100000>