Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 15:15:08 -0500 From: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> To: Paolo Pisati <piso@freebsd.org> Cc: Perforce Change Reviews <perforce@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: PERFORCE change 112546 for review Message-ID: <200701051515.09123.jhb@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20070105194538.GA55976@tin.it> References: <200701051629.l05GTpK2057571@repoman.freebsd.org> <200701051234.37394.jhb@freebsd.org> <20070105194538.GA55976@tin.it>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Friday 05 January 2007 14:45, Paolo Pisati wrote: > On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 12:34:37PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote: > > Also, can you make the intr_eoi_src and intr_disable_eoi_src function pointers > > be part of 'struct intr_event' passed to intr_event_create() instead of > > passing them to this function? You also shouldn't need to pass 'isrc' to > > the function as it's already in the intr_event. > > Yep, that's the plan. I'd actually like to make intr_event_handle() relative to what is in HEAD now so it can be backported to 6.x so we can also try out some things like put INTR_FAST handlers on a separate list in 6.x (we can't backport filters to 6.x though). This will also make the actual diff to do filters smaller as it will only really be tweaking MI code. -- John Baldwin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200701051515.09123.jhb>