Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 09:58:02 +1200 From: Philip Murray <pmurray@nevada.net.nz> To: Karl Denninger <karl@denninger.net>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 10.1 Memory Exhaustion Message-ID: <BF8D2D25-AD1F-4D9C-A70F-831CAC621059@nevada.net.nz> In-Reply-To: <55A3A800.5060904@denninger.net> References: <CAB2_NwCngPqFH4q-YZk00RO_aVF9JraeSsVX3xS0z5EV3YGa1Q@mail.gmail.com> <55A3A800.5060904@denninger.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On 13/07/2015, at 11:58 pm, Karl Denninger <karl@denninger.net> wrote: > > Put this on your box and see if the problem goes away.... :-) > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187594 > Is there a concise explanation of why this hasn’t been merged into -CURRENT? I know there are concerns that it isn’t the proper fix, but I can’t find any discussion of the argument against it. Only people with positive reports about it fixing people’s problems. Sorry if this keeps getting asked but I couldn’t find a good reason why not documented anywhere, which could form a reason not to use the patch in certain situations. (I have about 24TB about to go into production on ZFS, so I’m particularly interested in it) Cheers Phil
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?BF8D2D25-AD1F-4D9C-A70F-831CAC621059>