Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2005 12:34:47 +0100 From: Roman Neuhauser <neuhauser@chello.cz> To: Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org> Cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: amr performance woes and a bright side Message-ID: <20050315113447.GD10877@isis.sigpipe.cz> In-Reply-To: <42366B99.4040904@samsco.org> References: <1110847561.3412.38.camel@lanshark.dmv.com> <42366B99.4040904@samsco.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
# scottl@samsco.org / 2005-03-14 21:59:05 -0700:
> So setting aside the bonnie tests, the PQSQL stats do indeed show a
> problem. Is PGSQL threaded? If so, you might be running into some of
> the threading performance problems that are well known and are being
> worked on. I don't know a whole lot about PGSQL or the tests that you
> are talking about, but if you had an easy recipe for duplicating your
> test environment, I'd like to experiment some myself.
PostgreSQL is a forked program, it forks a backend process for each
connection, using shared memory for communication between the
backends.
--
How many Vietnam vets does it take to screw in a light bulb?
You don't know, man. You don't KNOW.
Cause you weren't THERE. http://bash.org/?255991
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050315113447.GD10877>