Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2007 16:36:56 +0300 From: Dmitry Marakasov <amdmi3@amdmi3.ru> To: Alex Dupre <ale@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Idea about the ports tree included in the release Message-ID: <20071124133656.GA47819@hades.panopticon> In-Reply-To: <4747E337.7060400@FreeBSD.org> References: <4747A1FB.9000707@FreeBSD.org> <4747E337.7060400@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Alex Dupre (ale@FreeBSD.org) wrote: > > In thinking about the guy who posted to -stable about using the tar'ed > > up version of the ports tree, I had an idea that would make that more > > useful. How hard would it be to include the c[v]sup checkouts file > > with the tarball, and install it into some standard location? > And why not the portsnap database instead? It seems the > default/recommended method today. I would think of both. I personally prefer c[v]sup because it doesn't delete custom patches, which I have a dozen. -- Dmitry A. Marakasov | jabber: amdmi3@jabber.ru amdmi3@amdmi3.ru | http://www.amdmi3.ru
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20071124133656.GA47819>