Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 14:30:01 -0700 From: Michael Sierchio <kudzu@tenebras.com> To: FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: A lot of pkg problems Message-ID: <CAHu1Y73Cf%2BDkaft%2BR-V1_mCktDiEH1diDPwi_f8DSvVNpkAz3w@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.11.1409161505350.93245@wonkity.com> References: <B2E0472020754D45B72E9B0CE35278CAB720593587@EXCHANGE.mail.starnet.cz> <2509308.9rytrV7MvD@penguin> <5411A89B.4010707@gmail.com> <1812950.bWcWxrzvJI@penguin> <54189CD1.7070102@webrz.net> <5418A5EE.1030304@hiwaay.net> <alpine.BSF.2.11.1409161505350.93245@wonkity.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 2:16 PM, Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com> wrote: > The amount of time people are willing to invest in "saving time" with > packages is interesting. In many cases, they could have built from ports > and been done quicker overall, or at least with less user involvement. And you can always do a 'make package' for a port - with the advantage of being able, in many cases, to answer config questions that can change the behavior and usefulness of a package (e.g., racoon with the control port enabled, disabled by default in the packages). - M
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAHu1Y73Cf%2BDkaft%2BR-V1_mCktDiEH1diDPwi_f8DSvVNpkAz3w>