Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2006 01:13:29 -0600 (MDT) From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> To: marcel@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG, src-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/amd64/conf NOTES src/sys/conf NOTES files files.amd64 files.i386 files.pc98 options options.amd64 options.i386 options.pc98 src/sys/i386/conf NOTES src/sys/ia64/conf NOTES src/sys/pc98/conf NOTES ... Message-ID: <20060730.011329.-490997054.imp@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <200607291838.k6TIctG4032258@repoman.freebsd.org> References: <200607291838.k6TIctG4032258@repoman.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message: <200607291838.k6TIctG4032258@repoman.freebsd.org>
Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@FreeBSD.ORG> writes:
: sio(4) is usable on less than half the platforms, not counting
: a future mips platform. Its presence in MI files is therefore
: increasingly becoming a burden.
On second thought, I guess I don't care enough to put up any kind of
stink. Forget I said anything. Instead of arguing over this, I'm
going to try to make these sorts of issues moot. The build system for
the kernel is showing its age and it is time for a revolution. No
sense planning one of those and quibbling over the old world order at
the same time :-)
Warner
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060730.011329.-490997054.imp>