Date: 05 Feb 2001 12:35:21 +0100 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> To: Kris Kennaway <kennaway@pacbell.net> Cc: Dan Nelson <dnelson@emsphone.com>, Christoph Kukulies <kuku@gilberto.physik.RWTH-Aachen.DE>, emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Realplay - linux Message-ID: <xzplmrltlae.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: Kris Kennaway's message of "Sun, 4 Feb 2001 22:19:59 -0800" References: <20010131083208.B64860@gil.physik.rwth-aachen.de> <20010131141051.A23635@dan.emsphone.com> <xzpn1c690du.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <20010204221959.B67969@mollari.cthul.hu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Kris Kennaway <kennaway@pacbell.net> writes: > On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 11:13:33AM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > Dan Nelson <dnelson@emsphone.com> writes: > > > options P1003_1B > > > options _KPOSIX_PRIORITY_SCHEDULING > > > options _KPOSIX_VERSION=199309L > > Does anybody know of a reason why this shouldn't be standard? > It is in GENERIC. That doesn't mean it's standard, it only means it's strongly recommended. I'm talking about making it non-optional. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzplmrltlae.fsf>