Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2016 01:43:49 +0000 From: "sepherosa_gmail.com (Sepherosa Ziehau)" <phabric-noreply@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: [Differential] D6689: tcp/lro: Implement hash table for LRO entries. Message-ID: <40411f33dd84bd596e0a38c74ac754a4@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <differential-rev-PHID-DREV-gqea3nyz45kho6yqfulz-req@FreeBSD.org> References: <differential-rev-PHID-DREV-gqea3nyz45kho6yqfulz-req@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
sepherosa_gmail.com added a comment. In https://reviews.freebsd.org/D6689#148252, @rrs wrote: > These look fine and familiar ;-) > > I think a hash table as an option to sorting is probably a good thing :D Yeah, and I got pretty exiting performance improvement and noticeable latency reduction with both methods in Azure for nginx 1KB~40KB web objects and 4/14 reqs/conn :)). I will post the result once 128/256 mbuf queue depth for sorting method is done (512/1024/2048/4096 have been completed so far). REVISION DETAIL https://reviews.freebsd.org/D6689 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://reviews.freebsd.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: sepherosa_gmail.com, glebius, gnn, bz, rwatson, gallatin, hselasky, #transport, rrs Cc: freebsd-net-list
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?40411f33dd84bd596e0a38c74ac754a4>