Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2022 17:01:16 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 261228] rtwnfw(4) number agreement in last sentence of first DESCRIPTION paragraph Message-ID: <bug-261228-227-DqlgJGmAn0@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-261228-227@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-261228-227@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D261228 --- Comment #3 from Bjoern A. Zeeb <bz@FreeBSD.org> --- (In reply to PauAmma from comment #2) Do we need that sentence at all given the SYNOPSIS? Also In the synopsis or description I'd suggest when it comes to loading modules that it gets at least hinted that normally one only needs one of th= ese firmware modules and not all (or only the ones for the chipset one has). Lastly given I scrolled through the man page, the license ACK got disabled = in 2016 by avos in 7453645f2a . --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-261228-227-DqlgJGmAn0>