Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 17:31:05 +0200 From: VANHULLEBUS Yvan <vanhu_bsd@zeninc.net> To: Norberto Meijome <freebsd@meijome.net> Cc: net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Current round of IPsec checkins complete... Message-ID: <20070702153105.GA27761@zen.inc> In-Reply-To: <20070703011627.5f3b8863@localhost> References: <m2tzso72a9.wl%gnn@neville-neil.com> <20070703005147.4427314f@localhost> <20070702145725.U31116@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> <20070703011627.5f3b8863@localhost>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 01:16:27AM +1000, Norberto Meijome wrote: > thanks. Just to be clear, do you mean 'NATT patches only available > for -CURRENT', or 'NATT patches for -CURRENT should apply OK in > -STABLE' ? Hi. http://vanhu.free.fr/FreeBSD/patch-natt-freebsd6-<latest version>.diff applies to STABLE, and currently does not needs update. It may apply to -CURRENT, but won't compile cleanly. http://vanhu.free.fr/FreeBSD/patch-natt-freebsd-HEAD-<latest version>.diff applies to -CURRENT, and latest version (2007-05-31) is not up to date with recent changes. Patch may apply and compile, but there will be at least some extra patch to files that won't exist anymore, and some other problems could happen. I'm upgrading my -CURRENT + NAT-T patches sources to update the -HEAD patch, and to check if it work. Yvan. -- NETASQ http://www.netasq.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070702153105.GA27761>