Date: Tue, 8 May 2001 16:05:49 -0700 (MST) From: "Chad R. Larson" <chad@DCFinc.com> To: juha@saarinen.org (Juha Saarinen) Cc: kris@obsecurity.org, nuno.mailinglists@pt-quorum.com, guilherme@nortenet.pt, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: CFLAGS Optimization Message-ID: <200105082305.QAA04771@freeway.dcfinc.com> In-Reply-To: <KPECIILENDDLPCNIMLOFCENMCDAA.juha@saarinen.org> from Juha Saarinen at "May 8, 1 08:00:34 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As I recall, Juha Saarinen wrote: > :: The risk is the same in Linux; they both use gcc, and it's gcc which > :: has the optimizer bugs. It's more common to use absurd gcc > :: optimizations in the Linux community for some reason (perhaps they're > :: used to code misbehaving, so additional brokenness from the gcc > :: doesn't add much ;-) > :: > :: Just Say No. > > Hrrmm... that's tantamount to saying Linux and FreeBSD has a > fundamentally b0rken compiler. Not "fundamentally" broken or else it couldn't generate a working system. Perhaps you'd be more comfortable if we changed the documentation to remove all references to any -O switch with a number attached? > -- Juha -crl -- Chad R. Larson (CRL15) 602-953-1392 Brother, can you paradigm? chad@dcfinc.com chad@larsons.org larson1@home.com DCF, Inc. - 14623 North 49th Place, Scottsdale, Arizona 85254-2207 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200105082305.QAA04771>