Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 16:18:42 -0400 (EDT) From: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> To: Andre Oppermann <andre@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: original interface name? (5.*) Message-ID: <200409102018.i8AKIgg2038012@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> In-Reply-To: <414208EE.B7F43DB6@freebsd.org> References: <20040910191831.GP89036@lucky.net> <20040910194642.GC84228@lucky.net> <20040910195826.GE28085@odin.ac.hmc.edu> <414208EE.B7F43DB6@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
<<On Fri, 10 Sep 2004 22:05:02 +0200, Andre Oppermann <andre@FreeBSD.ORG> said: > Brooks Davis wrote: >> I'm considering adding an ifconfig -v option that would imply -m and add >> more details like index, epoch, dname, dunit, etc. > That would be great! A particularly relevant feature would give `ifconfig' an option to emit the current configuration of the interface in a form which would be acceptable on the `ifconfig' command line. -GAWollman
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200409102018.i8AKIgg2038012>