Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2004 16:14:15 +0200 From: Cerion Armour-Brown <cerion@open-works.co.uk> To: "Sheets, Jason (OZ CEEDR)" <jason.sheets@hp.com>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: alternative to 'top' in jail Message-ID: <200410041614.15582.cerion@open-works.co.uk> References: <2D8BB15C7B5C214F81C32D3A83B32736013D4FDE@idbexc01.americas.cpqcorp.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Saturday 02 October 2004 17:29, you wrote: > > I have a jail with a freebsd jails provider... > > What do people use as an alternative to 'top', inside a jail? > > What else can I use to measure resource usage (cpu/ram/io) > > Try systat, comes with the system > Jason Thanks for the reply, but I should have given more info... running systat, I only get: "error reading kmem at c03db09c" =2E.. And looking in dev: lrwxrwxrwx 1 root wheel 4 Jul 21 13:37 /dev/mem@ -> null lrwxrwxrwx 1 root wheel 4 Jul 21 13:37 /dev/kmem@ -> null =46rom googling I understand this is a security restriction imposed by my j= ails=20 provider. I found a mention on freebsd-hackers archive of a patch to top: http://www.mail-archive.com/freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org/msg33464.html Does anyone use this patch + can recommend it? If so, where can I get it? I've also tried the perl module Sys::CpuLoad, but haven't found it very=20 usefule. Any ideas/comments appreciated! Thanks, Cerion
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200410041614.15582.cerion>