Date: Sun, 06 Jul 1997 02:11:17 +0100 From: Brian Somers <brian@awfulhak.org> To: =?KOI8-R?B?4c7E0sXKIP7F0s7P1w==?= <ache@nagual.pp.ru> Cc: Brian Somers <awfulhak.org!brian@agora.rdrop.com>, cvs-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, cvs-sbin@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sbin/init init.c Message-ID: <199707060111.CAA08263@awfulhak.demon.co.uk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 06 Jul 1997 03:44:44 %2B0400." <Pine.BSF.3.96.970706034147.5780A-100000@lsd.relcom.eu.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Sun, 6 Jul 1997, Brian Somers wrote: > > > Now that the dust has settled, does anyone have any preferences > > for having ppp hangup (but not exit in -auto & -ddial) with a > > HUP (like it does currently w/ INT) ? > > I think if you restore previous HUP reaction in ppp and use ppp in > /etc/ttys like getty, it will got HUP (from revoke) and the trouble will > be up again. Well, people should only put "ppp -direct" in /etc/ttys, but I guess the HUP isn't necessary (and will cause problems w/ old versions of init). I'll leave things as they are :-) > -- > Andrey A. Chernov > <ache@null.net> > http://www.nagual.pp.ru/~ache/ -- Brian <brian@awfulhak.org>, <brian@freebsd.org> <http://www.awfulhak.org>; Don't _EVER_ lose your sense of humour....
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199707060111.CAA08263>