Date: Sun, 8 Oct 2000 11:20:12 -0500 (CDT) From: Mike Meyer <mwm@mired.org> To: attila! <attila@hun.org> Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: re: sio problems? Message-ID: <14816.40636.858363.525382@guru.mired.org> In-Reply-To: <20001008074906.4DB1E1C2AB@hun.org> References: <14815.51152.842361.329859@guru.mired.org> <20001008074906.4DB1E1C2AB@hun.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
attila! writes: > on Sat, 7 Oct 2000 20:03:12 -0500 (CDT), Mike Meyer <mwm@mired.org> said: > > I recently got my digital camera back out, and started pulling the old > > pictures from it. I noticed something I hadn't ever seen before - silo > > overflows from the sio port. At the moment, I'm wondering if this is a > > known problem that is being investigated (SMPNG comes to mind), or > > something new. > Other than the sio irq overflows, which does not seem to > particularly impact performance and which I am sure will be > solved, I think team has done a superb job with the SMPNG > cutover. Well, it's making a serious impact on performance for camera. I wasn't able to reliably download images at even half speed. I gave up and dropped from 115K to 9.6K. I can probably get better speed than that, but even if it's 28K, that's noticable :-(. On the other hand, that's the only real problem I've seen. Unfortunately, I haven't used the thing since the hardware was cutover from -stable, so I can't pin it down either. <mike To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?14816.40636.858363.525382>