Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 15:30:40 +0100 From: Sameh Ghane <sw@anthologeek.net> To: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Ollivier Robert <roberto@ns2.freenix.org>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/sysutils/portupgrade Makefile distinfo Message-ID: <20020128153040.A12102@anthologeek.net> In-Reply-To: <3C555FCC.F96E17BE@FreeBSD.org>; from sobomax@FreeBSD.org on Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 04:27:24PM %2B0200 References: <200201272322.g0RNMEB48301@freefall.freebsd.org> <200201272324.g0RNOfD96592@lists.unixathome.org> <20020128140151.GA17026@ns2.freenix.org> <3C555FCC.F96E17BE@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Le (On) Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 04:27:24PM +0200, Maxim Sobolev ecrivit (wrote): > > > > portupgrade and friends are a blessing to anyone who maintain FreeBSD > > machines. It is one of the most useful utilities I know and it would > > qualify the wholoe lot for inclusion in /usr/src if it wouldn't mean > > that we need Ruby in the base system... :-) > > What's wrong with it in the ports? I think that the general direction > is to move optional things from the base system to ports, not other > way around. And keeping it in the ports tree is a nice way to stay tuned with portupgrade's upgrades, using portupgrade. -- Sameh To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020128153040.A12102>