Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 08:37:17 +1100 From: Peter Jeremy <peter.jeremy@alcatel.com.au> To: Mike Smith <msmith@hub.freebsd.org> Cc: Mark Murray <mark@grondar.za>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libpam/modules/pam_unix pam_unix.c Message-ID: <20020212083717.A68671@gsmx07.alcatel.com.au> In-Reply-To: <20020205164329.A88662@hub.freebsd.org>; from msmith@hub.freebsd.org on Tue, Feb 05, 2002 at 04:43:29PM -0800 References: <20020205164329.A88662@hub.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
There was a thread about this on -arch 3 weeks ago. I suggest that -arch is a more appropraite forum for this discussion and have re-directed followups. On 2002-Feb-05 16:43:29 -0800, Mike Smith <msmith@hub.freebsd.org> wrote: >> > I agree with Andrey here, pam_unix(8) should not clobber random()'s >> > internal state. >> >> OK. I have a local patch. As soon as I se that it survives the usual >> build, I'll commit it. > >This won't make random() thread-safe. Please fix the problem properly. 8) Does this mean that we should implement random_r() and friends? Peter To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020212083717.A68671>