Date: Fri, 19 Jul 1996 22:17:59 -0700 From: "Michael L. VanLoon -- HeadCandy.com" <michaelv@HeadCandy.com> To: Amancio Hasty <hasty@rah.star-gate.com> Cc: "Marty Leisner" <leisner@sdsp.mc.xerox.com>, "Craig Shaver" <craig@progroup.com>, freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Opinions? NT VS UNIX, NT SUCKS SOMETIMES Message-ID: <199607200517.WAA20535@MindBender.HeadCandy.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of Fri, 19 Jul 96 17:53:45 -0700. <199607200053.RAA04779@rah.star-gate.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>>From The Desk Of "Marty Leisner" :
>> I really get miffed hearing people laud the robustness of NT and
>> OS/2...I found both pale to current copies of linux and FreeBSD.
>Well, it depends on your point of view. Yes Linux and FreeBSD are probably
>more robust than NT or OS/2 however from a DOS and Win3.1 point of view
>NT is rock solid 8)
>From a FreeBSD or NetBSD point of view, NT is still rock solid. "More
robust" depends on how you define "robust", I guess.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Michael L. VanLoon michaelv@HeadCandy.com
--< Free your mind and your machine -- NetBSD free un*x >--
NetBSD working ports: 386+PC, Mac 68k, Amiga, Atari 68k, HP300, Sun3,
Sun4/4c/4m, DEC MIPS, DEC Alpha, PC532, VAX, MVME68k, arm32...
NetBSD ports in progress: PICA, others...
Roll your own Internet access -- Seattle People's Internet cooperative.
If you're in the Seattle area, ask me how.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199607200517.WAA20535>