Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2000 12:12:03 -0400 From: "Mike O'Dell" <mo@servo.ccr.org> To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: problems building kernels Message-ID: <200007111612.MAA61587@servo.ccr.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
is anyone else more than a little concerned that the people who ostensibly understand all the details can't agree as to how to do what and when?? and this is supposed to be STABLE??? give us a break, guys. you don't go changing how a kernel gets built in a release called STABLE. and if you didn't do that, please explain that we can just ignore all the mail the last few days and go back to trying to figure out why cvsup-ing the latest STABLE release doesn't compile/run-on-SMP/etc,etc,etc i'll restate my minority view that the FreeBSD project *really* needs to rethink their release names and the whole release process, rather than explaining that we don't understand the effort's peculiar definitions of words like "stable" but i'll shut up now. the last time i said this i generated a few free kilowatts with the recovered heat from the flaming... -mo To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200007111612.MAA61587>