Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2010 21:31:54 +0100 From: Rui Paulo <rpaulo@freebsd.org> To: Andriy Gapon <avg@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, Navdeep Parhar <np@freebsd.org>, freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: amd64 kernel modules: mapping sections to addresses Message-ID: <99843999-233B-4E07-B815-9808B85B599A@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <4C2476A1.1080307@freebsd.org> References: <4C1F798C.7010204@freebsd.org> <201006211143.26459.jhb@freebsd.org> <4C1F8BDD.9010408@freebsd.org> <201006211610.45811.jhb@freebsd.org> <20100621204435.GA98177@hub.freebsd.org> <4C1FDAF9.3080808@freebsd.org> <4C208096.3030602@freebsd.org> <4C2476A1.1080307@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 25 Jun 2010, at 10:28, Andriy Gapon wrote: >=20 > Here's a patch that is supposed to do the right thing for dtrace. > Perhaps I should have put the new code under __amd64__, but I decided = to go more > "generic" and check for module's ELF type (ET_REL). >=20 > Reviews and testing are welcome! I believe this is good to go. Regards, -- Rui Paulo
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?99843999-233B-4E07-B815-9808B85B599A>