Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2019 23:09:31 +0200 From: Alex Samorukov <samm@net-art.cz> To: Kyle Evans <kevans@freebsd.org> Cc: Ian Lepore <ian@freebsd.org>, "freebsd-arm@freebsd.org" <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Few of my articles about FreeBSD on ARM Message-ID: <3e7273c4-a11f-af63-771b-91b46c39f7a2@net-art.cz> In-Reply-To: <CACNAnaH-QoA2hgRVhdXs=Xtmg=EgwREPxJms=6E0C9E79CB02w@mail.gmail.com> References: <c3584dbb-0734-b9c6-71c5-8e2f1f448f10@net-art.cz> <ba244ef592b00101cf65e7c3ace83fae11e448bc.camel@freebsd.org> <94eaa9c9-f826-b039-30c5-9161d163131a@net-art.cz> <CACNAnaH-QoA2hgRVhdXs=Xtmg=EgwREPxJms=6E0C9E79CB02w@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 11/07/2019 21:11, Kyle Evans wrote: > Looks interesting, but seems to be abandoned long time ago. There is >> also toybox, which is a busybox-like but with a better license. Busybox >> seems to be most active and commonly used in the Linux/embedded >> projects, thats why i started with it. I will try to submit my patches >> to upstream after finishing them. >> > May I ask what gives you this impression? bsdbox is actively used in > freebsd-wifi-build by myself and at least a couple of others. It > doesn't see a whole lot of active commits because unlike with Busybox, > it's a crunch setup much like rescue -- there's not a whole lot to > bsdbox specifically other than adding another PROG from base to build > in. There are some programs that would be nice to have, but they just > haven't been added yet for one reason or the other- most likely being > that they just don't get used much in the limited environments that > it's currently used in. Thank you for clarification. My [wrong] impression was caused by commit history. I will take a look on it one more time.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3e7273c4-a11f-af63-771b-91b46c39f7a2>