Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2003 14:01:14 +0300 From: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org> To: Pawel Jakub Dawidek <nick@garage.freebsd.pl> Cc: doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: bsd.kmod.mk and manual pages. Message-ID: <20030901110114.GA66803@sunbay.com> In-Reply-To: <20030901084836.GG47959@garage.freebsd.pl> References: <20030901064611.A3167@phantom.cris.net> <20030901071320.GF30277@sunbay.com> <20030901084836.GG47959@garage.freebsd.pl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--tKW2IUtsqtDRztdT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Sep 01, 2003 at 10:48:36AM +0200, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: > On Mon, Sep 01, 2003 at 10:13:20AM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > The short answer is NO, you should put your manpage in share/man/man4/. > > The long answer is that it was decided that bsd.kmod.mk will not handle > > manpages anymore, as it's likely that src/sys/modules/ will disappear > > at some point completely. >=20 > This isn't too friendly for 3rd-party kernel modules... >=20 Take it up with arch@ then. I'm not against readding it if there will be strong supporters of this option (it's trivial). Cheers, --=20 Ruslan Ermilov Sysadmin and DBA, ru@sunbay.com Sunbay Software Ltd, ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer --tKW2IUtsqtDRztdT Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/Uyb5Ukv4P6juNwoRAhRxAJ4h133ZQ8srMzlZ6tTDjO9YNN7GgQCeP2SK jMmzHvqvnxnxOhusepvxZSw= =HBgY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --tKW2IUtsqtDRztdT--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030901110114.GA66803>