Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2014 20:06:37 +0300 (MSK) From: Dmitry Morozovsky <marck@rinet.ru> To: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Lo=EFc_Blot?= <loic.blot@unix-experience.fr> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: High Kernel Load with nfsv4 Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1412192005130.6852@woozle.rinet.ru> In-Reply-To: <1e19554bc0d4eb3e8dab74e2056b5ec4@mail.unix-experience.fr> References: <766911003.8048587.1418095910736.JavaMail.root@uoguelph.ca> <1e19554bc0d4eb3e8dab74e2056b5ec4@mail.unix-experience.fr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Loic, On Wed, 10 Dec 2014, Lo?c Blot wrote: > Hi Rick, > I'm trying NFSv3. > Some jails are starting very well but now i have an issue with lockd after some minutes: > > nfs server 10.10.X.8:/jails: lockd not responding > nfs server 10.10.X.8:/jails lockd is alive again > > I look at mbuf, but i seems there is no problem. > > Here is my rc.conf on server: > > nfs_server_enable="YES" > nfsv4_server_enable="YES" > nfsuserd_enable="YES" > nfsd_server_flags="-u -t -n 256" just a random thought: are you sure you want so much nfsd threads? I suppose lock contention could be easily involved here... [snip] -- Sincerely, D.Marck [DM5020, MCK-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] [ FreeBSD committer: marck@FreeBSD.org ] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru *** ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1412192005130.6852>