Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2000 13:09:07 -0600 From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> To: Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@uunet.co.za> Cc: Konstantin Chuguev <Konstantin.Chuguev@dante.org.uk>, "Jacques A. Vidrine" <n@nectar.com>, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: People running with LOCALBASE set to something other than /usr/local? Message-ID: <200008241909.NAA11539@harmony.village.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 23 Aug 2000 14:44:36 %2B0200." <14141.967034676@axl.fw.uunet.co.za> References: <14141.967034676@axl.fw.uunet.co.za>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <14141.967034676@axl.fw.uunet.co.za> Sheldon Hearn writes: : On Wed, 23 Aug 2000 13:36:56 +0100, Konstantin Chuguev wrote: : : > Just wondering: what is the reason of using /opt instead of /usr/local, : > apart from Solaris influence? Do you use /usr/local for anything? : : NetBSD uses /usr/opt . It's a matter of taste. :-) NetBSD uses /usr/pkg. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200008241909.NAA11539>