Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 10 Jul 1996 23:56:12 -0400
From:      "Jacob M. Parnas" <jparnas@jparnas.cybercom.net>
To:        Michael Smith <msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au>
Cc:        stesin@elvisti.kiev.ua, Kevin_Swanson@blacksmith.com, hardware@freebsd.org, bsdi-users@bsdi.com
Subject:   Re: muliport boards - building a PPP dialup server 
Message-ID:  <199607110356.XAA00628@jparnas.cybercom.net>
In-Reply-To: Your message of Sat, 06 Jul 1996 19:42:42 %2B0930. <199607061012.TAA23745@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

In message <199607061012.TAA23745@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au>you write:
>Jacob M. Parnas stands accused of saying:
>> >
>> >Quatech do a card called the DS-100 with a pair of PC16550D's and an 18MHz
>> >clock and a jumperable /1 /2 /5 /10 divider that will allow your to
>> >run your 16550 ports significantly faster.
>> >
>> >Unfortunately, they tried to implement the card properly, and as such
>> >we have had serious problems with the cards in fast (>486/33) machines.
>>
>> It shouldn't be a hard thing.  Simply build a fifo which has say a 1
>> Megabit of memory on it (pretty cheap these days).  It sends an
>> interrupt if it goes from full to not full or another if it reaches
>> half full.  If known by the kernel not to be empty, empty it 25
>> times/second (if it was full at 10 MB/sec, it would be emptied in
>> 1/80th of a second.)  That's fast, cheap, and will go very fast.
>> I'm not even hardware oriented, but can see that it wouldn't be hard
>> or difficult to build or program, and would support very fast I/O.

In my opinion, when people can't back up their statements or opinions 
with logical arguments, the smart ones admit their stumped, the rest resort
to personal insults.  I didn't insult you.  I don't see why you want to 
turn this from an polite discussion or bow out instead of what should go
to alt.flame.

>Out of the mouths of babes - Jacob, it's _blindingly_obvious_ that you
>don't know spit about hardware.  Attempting to discuss this with you
>would be like trying to talk existentialism with a donkey.

Purely a personal insult.  No substance behind the statement at all.

>Or do you honestly believe that you, with your self-avowed lack of
>hardware orientation, can come up with something that hasn't been done
>before?  Are you _really_ that concieted?

Purely a personal insult.  No substance behind the statement at all.

I have very little training in economics, but I knew that Digital and IBM 
were in trouble when most of their business was significantly overpriced for
no increase in production (comparing workstations to mainframes in the late 
1980's).  In other words, because I'm more software oriented than hardware
doesn't mean I'm wrong about a hardware statement.

>> Back to the personal insults.  This is where I step off.  I have better 
>> things to do than act like elementary school kids trading insults.  What's
>> next? "My daddy can beat up your daddy".

>Jacob; you butt in on a discussion brandishing your swollen ignorance
>and your myopic perspecive in everyone's face, and then burst into
>tears when this is pointed out to you.  There is nothing 'mature' in
>this attitude, so I can't see what you're complaining about.

Believe me, I'm not bursting into tears over this.  If you review your 
statements in the message I'm responding to, you'll see there isn't anything
but personal insults from you in it and not one single attempt at a criticism
of why my design would not work.  I know its not optimal, but it isn't
overly expensive and have no reason to believe it wouldn't work work.

>> Jacob M. Parnas

I think most people see this newsgroup as a vehicle to help eachother
rather than flame eachother.  

Responding to a message is not "butting into a discussion".  I don't consider
what my role in this thread particularly mature but polite and trying to be
helpful.  More normal than mature.  On the other hand, your response is
in my opinion, extremely immature and inappropriate for this discussion.
Its just a personal flame against me with no substance behind it.  Read
it again, and I think you'll see that what I say is true.

>-- 
>]] Mike Smith, Software Engineer        msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au    [[
>]] Genesis Software                     genesis@atrad.adelaide.edu.au   [[
>]] High-speed data acquisition and      (GSM mobile) 0411-222-496       [[
>]] realtime instrument control          (ph/fax)  +61-8-267-3039        [[
>]] Collector of old Unix hardware.      "Where are your PEZ?" The Tick  [[

Jacob M. Parnas



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199607110356.XAA00628>