Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 10:04:34 +0100 From: Alberto Villa <avilla@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-desktop@freebsd.org Cc: desktop@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What about improving the desktop ports consistency: task 1, the fonts Message-ID: <201201201004.36979.avilla@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20120120065141.GM4729@azathoth.lan> References: <20120120065141.GM4729@azathoth.lan>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Friday 20 January 2012 07:51:41 Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > I have seen that some ports use INSTALLS_* from bsd.xorg.mk, some others do > the mkfontscale first and directly package the fonts.scale fonts.* stuff > in the package. Just a random thought: may it be that there is also no consistency in fonts tarballs upstream packaging? > (do we still need that FontPath thing?, if no then the > pkg-message asking people to fill it should be dropped) I think we do, but will try and report. > If you are not willing to write the page, I'll do, but I need someone > describing me how things are working together in the font world. Unfortunately I don't know this kind of stuff. If no one here does, we might call for help in x11@ (eadler?)... -- Alberto Villa, FreeBSD committer <avilla@FreeBSD.org> http://people.FreeBSD.org/~avilla As of next Thursday, UNIX will be flushed in favor of TOPS-10. Please update your programs. [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) iJwEAAECAAYFAk8ZLiQACgkQ3xiC6kQ1CovNjgP/eybfQRMlEGbJatxG1S5Yq74z lY/IgOgHVmAU7rXrGfWwhnPmAFmE9BTRFxM23CbApXXGcAslzOVUmwCpXAYYd1N3 30rI/YRxO9xvfL8zVjN7Z4mbcc6L7pYCcvSRUf8LdsHOlvzeqGWEfqxubDDk1GL7 491S9zxChTIs4ZIz8ik= =RKzK -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201201201004.36979.avilla>