Date: Sat, 11 May 2002 02:50:04 -0700 (PDT) From: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: docs/37943: [PATCH] minor corrections for cutting-edge Message-ID: <200205110950.g4B9o4l33371@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR docs/37943; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@freebsd.org>
To: Martin Heinen <martin@sumuk.de>
Cc: bug-followup@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: docs/37943: [PATCH] minor corrections for cutting-edge
Date: Sat, 11 May 2002 12:27:02 +0300
The majority of the changes look fine. Where I am commenting below,
there are a few fine points I was thinking about.
On 2002-05-11 00:46, Martin Heinen wrote:
> - <para>The most recent example of this is when the <quote/ppp/ group
> - (later renamed <quote/network/) was added. Users had the
> + <para>The most recent example of this is when the <groupname>ppp</groupname> group
> + (later renamed <groupname>network</groupname>) was added. Users had the
This is also touched by patches of another PR I was reading. One
submitted by Greg Shapiro. If someone commits this one or the diff I
sent in the audit trail of that PR a little merging work will be
necessary for this part ;)
> - Pentium 3 with 128 MB of RAM takes about 2 hours to build
> + Pentium III with 128 MB of RAM takes about 2 hours to build
Is this really necessary? I'm not saying it's wrong or something.
But is III the way these processors should be referred to in written
text?
Giorgos Keramidas FreeBSD Documentation Project
keramida@{freebsd.org,ceid.upatras.gr} http://www.FreeBSD.org/docproj/
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200205110950.g4B9o4l33371>