Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2024 16:21:44 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: fs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 267028] kernel panics when booting with both (zfs,ko or vboxnetflt,ko or acpi_wmi.ko) and amdgpu.ko Message-ID: <bug-267028-3630-H8NprVxYhB@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-267028-3630@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-267028-3630@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D267028 --- Comment #346 from Mark Millard <marklmi26-fbsd@yahoo.com> --- (In reply to George Mitchell from comment #344) You might want to adjust the text of the panic as well, so that the wording does not mislead folks reading what is reported by the panic: no longer suggest the condition's status. It looks to me like the code: if ((frame->tf_rflags & PSL_I) =3D=3D 0) { /* * Buggy application or kernel code has disabled * interrupts and then trapped. Enabling interrupts * now is wrong, but it is better than running with * interrupts disabled until they are accidentally * enabled later. */ . . . would still happen and do: default: printf( "kernel trap %d with interrupts disabled\n", type); /* * We shouldn't enable interrupts while hol= ding a * spin lock. */ if (td->td_md.md_spinlock_count =3D=3D 0) enable_intr(); It might be that Andriy was suggesting avoiding parts of this in some way. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-267028-3630-H8NprVxYhB>