Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2001 13:54:56 +0100 (CET) From: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> To: ru@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de, phk@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: rev 1.61 of /sys/netinet/in.c breaks ISDN Message-ID: <200112071254.fB7Csv802702@Magelan.Leidinger.net> In-Reply-To: <20011207095553.D13705@sunbay.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 7 Dez, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
>> The magical destination address is 0.0.0.1. It is used as a
>> `placeholder' address for the remote side, so you can add a route to
>> it.
>>
>> Should probably be extended to 0.0.0.*, so you can add more than one
>> interface that way.
I thought this already happened...
[...]
> OK, but is it really necessary? It's much simpler to add routes
> over P2P interfaces using the interface name rather than the
> ``other end's IP address'':
>
> route add default -iface tun0
'route add default -iface ispX' in this case (that's the way I use it,
btw).
Bye,
Alexander.
--
To boldly go where I surely don't belong.
http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net
GPG fingerprint = C518 BC70 E67F 143F BE91 3365 79E2 9C60 B006 3FE7
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200112071254.fB7Csv802702>