Date: Tue, 3 Jun 1997 23:23:28 -0400 (EDT) From: Ben Black <black@zen.cypher.net> To: Michael Hancock <michaelh@cet.co.jp> Cc: FreeBSD Hackers <hackers@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: Why routed and not gated by default? Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.91.970603232252.2553C-100000@zen.cypher.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.SV4.3.95.970604115327.29679A-100000@parkplace.cet.co.jp>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
well, i discovered today that ip aliasing on BSDI involves aliasing to loopback and adding arp table entries, so i don't think i trust them ;) On Wed, 4 Jun 1997, Michael Hancock wrote: > On Tue, 3 Jun 1997, Bill Fenner wrote: > > > Brandon Gillespie <brandon@ice.cold.org> wrote: > > >Basically, other systems seem to be able to automatically setup gated just > > >fine without problems (Digital Unix comes to mind). > > > > The two things that it's trivial to configure gated for are rip and > > router discovery, which are the things that routed does just fine. > > FWIW, Jeffrey Hoenig now at BSDI made their routed a perl script that > calls gated. > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.LNX.3.91.970603232252.2553C-100000>