Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 3 Jun 1997 23:23:28 -0400 (EDT)
From:      Ben Black <black@zen.cypher.net>
To:        Michael Hancock <michaelh@cet.co.jp>
Cc:        FreeBSD Hackers <hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   Re: Why routed and not gated by default? 
Message-ID:  <Pine.LNX.3.91.970603232252.2553C-100000@zen.cypher.net>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SV4.3.95.970604115327.29679A-100000@parkplace.cet.co.jp>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
well, i discovered today that ip aliasing on BSDI involves aliasing to 
loopback and adding arp table entries, so i don't think i trust them ;)

On Wed, 4 Jun 1997, Michael Hancock wrote:

> On Tue, 3 Jun 1997, Bill Fenner wrote:
> 
> > Brandon Gillespie <brandon@ice.cold.org> wrote:
> > >Basically, other systems seem to be able to automatically setup gated just
> > >fine without problems (Digital Unix comes to mind).
> > 
> > The two things that it's trivial to configure gated for are rip and
> > router discovery, which are the things that routed does just fine.
> 
> FWIW, Jeffrey Hoenig now at BSDI made their routed a perl script that
> calls gated.
> 
> 



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.LNX.3.91.970603232252.2553C-100000>