Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2003 23:47:36 +0100 (BST) From: "=?iso-8859-1?q?Pedro=20F.=20Giffuni?=" <giffunip@yahoo.com> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Is umfpack really broken?? Message-ID: <20030807224736.91742.qmail@web13402.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20030807205558.GB76279@rot13.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--- Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 08:19:47PM +0100, Pedro F. Giffuni wrote: > > Hi; > > >From the log umfpack appears to be broken by a bug in ATLAS, but it was > > labelled: "BROKEN: Does not install" > > Perhaps it is now also broken by the ATLAS upgrade ;-) > OK ..that means I have to fix it :). > > Build logs are available on http://bento.freebsd.org. > > http://bento.freebsd.org/errorlogs/i386-4-full/umfpack-4.1.log > Hmm.. ok, I looked at the current build and not on this one. thanks, Pedro. ________________________________________________________________________ Want to chat instantly with your online friends? Get the FREE Yahoo! Messenger http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030807224736.91742.qmail>