Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 06:59:47 -0500 From: "Jacques A. Vidrine" <n@nectar.com> To: Hal Snyder <hal@vailsys.com> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libc.a(err.o) Message-ID: <20010725065947.A27000@hellblazer.nectar.com> In-Reply-To: <87d76pmsv5.fsf_-_@gamera.vail>; from hal@vailsys.com on Wed, Jul 25, 2001 at 01:21:18AM -0500 References: <20010725002838.J72882@sneakerz.org> <87d76pmsv5.fsf_-_@gamera.vail>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jul 25, 2001 at 01:21:18AM -0500, Hal Snyder wrote: > I am wondering if there is a problem with err, warn, etc. in libc. [snip] > Bug? Feature? > Do we want separate modules? Weak symbols? Yes, it is a bug. IMHO we should be using weak symbols for all globally visibile identifiers in libc that are not defined by ISO/IEC 9899:199[09]. This comes up periodically; check the archives. Basically somebody needs to do the work. Cheers, -- Jacques Vidrine / n@nectar.com / jvidrine@verio.net / nectar@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010725065947.A27000>