Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2012 02:20:55 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Olivier_Cochard=2DLabb=E9?= <olivier@cochard.me> To: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@freebsd.org> Cc: net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [CFT/Review] net byte order for AF_INET Message-ID: <CA%2Bq%2BTcrC5DCg00UfR8TT9qc38mc6LEEs6Mf=E42VkwQ1fbLMiQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20121010233404.GI34622@glebius.int.ru> References: <20121009154128.GU34622@FreeBSD.org> <20121010195842.GH34622@FreeBSD.org> <20121010222651.GR40452@mdounin.ru> <20121010233404.GI34622@glebius.int.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I've done some tests with this net byte ordered(NBO) patch: - I've compiled 2 i386 images of BSD Router Project (current branch rev241418): One with the patch, and the other without the patch [1] - I've run my "full-features testing lab" under VirtualBox [2] using theses images. Here are the differences: - I can't SSH to and between the NBO-patched-FreeBSD; - Lot's of messages "in_cksum_skip: out of data by 28560/23460" on the non-patched FreeBSD (R2 and R3 on the diagram in [2]) - PPTP tunnel (net/mpd5) didn't works on the NBO-patched-FreeBSD; Regards, Olivier [1] http://gugus69.free.fr/freebsd/netbyteorder/ [2] http://bsdrp.net/documentation/examples/maximum_bsdrp_features_lab
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CA%2Bq%2BTcrC5DCg00UfR8TT9qc38mc6LEEs6Mf=E42VkwQ1fbLMiQ>