Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2015 21:59:25 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 156226] [lagg]: failover does not announce the failover to switch Message-ID: <bug-156226-2472-6KpIAC8dUW@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-156226-2472@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-156226-2472@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=156226 --- Comment #8 from weberge42@gmail.com --- (In reply to eugen from comment #7) Yes, but if you have the following setup: Server NIC1 - Switch 1 Server NIC2 - Switch 2 If NIC1 is active and Switch 1 fails, NIC2 becomes active and it takes ages to see traffic flowing again. I can't remember if the standby link is up but no traffic flowing or if it is really down (down as in disabled). I will try to investigate this a little bit further when i have access to the switches again (tried with fortiswitch 548d, latest firmware) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-156226-2472-6KpIAC8dUW>