Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2020 12:01:56 -0500 From: Ed Maste <emaste@freebsd.org> To: "Wall, Stephen" <stephen.wall@redcom.com> Cc: Bob Bishop <rb@gid.co.uk>, "freebsd-security@freebsd.org" <freebsd-security@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-20:33.openssl Message-ID: <CAPyFy2DTv01jTeHj%2B9gJZR%2BxsE5ZDcvPK-T_8Cy3_KvF4E_oUA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAPyFy2D%2BtRvMufcyJ14Ff6srcSeGibtF%2B3ntLD6kHtfcG7V52g@mail.gmail.com> References: <DM6PR09MB4807705DEABCF189CCAE6A87EECB0@DM6PR09MB4807.namprd09.prod.outlook.com> <CAPyFy2D%2BtRvMufcyJ14Ff6srcSeGibtF%2B3ntLD6kHtfcG7V52g@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 14 Dec 2020 at 11:46, Ed Maste <emaste@freebsd.org> wrote: > > On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 at 10:43, Wall, Stephen <stephen.wall@redcom.com> wro= te: > > > > > A query: am I right that the patch doesn=E2=80=99t bump the OpenSSL v= ersion to 1.1.1.i ? > > > > That is correct. > > Further to that, OpenSSL 1.1.1i includes some additional, minor > changes beyond the vulnerability fix. 1.1.1i is now in HEAD (as of > r368472) and has been merged to stable/12. Oops, I got ahead of myself - it has not yet been merged to stable/12.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAPyFy2DTv01jTeHj%2B9gJZR%2BxsE5ZDcvPK-T_8Cy3_KvF4E_oUA>