Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 11:04:54 +0000 From: Gavin Atkinson <gavin.atkinson@ury.york.ac.uk> To: Tai-hwa Liang <avatar@mmlab.cse.yzu.edu.tw> Cc: Bachilo Dmitry <root@solink.ru>, stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mount_smbfs trouble after cvsup Message-ID: <1140606294.59408.8.camel@buffy.york.ac.uk> In-Reply-To: <06022119291516.78019@www.mmlab.cse.yzu.edu.tw> References: <200602211455.01731.root@solink.ru> <06022119291516.78019@www.mmlab.cse.yzu.edu.tw>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Tue, 2006-02-21 at 19:29 +0800, Tai-hwa Liang wrote: > On Tue, 21 Feb 2006, Bachilo Dmitry wrote: > > I've cvsuped from 6.0 to 6.1-PRERELEASE and now I can't mount NT's shares with > > password. It worked fine before, but after cvsup i get > > mount_smbfs: unable to open connection: syserr = Authentication error > > and in /var/log/messages I get > > Feb 21 14:51:24 notebook kernel: netsmb_dev: loaded > > Feb 21 14:51:27 notebook kernel: smb_encrypt: password encryption is not > > available > > Feb 21 14:51:27 notebook kernel: smb_ntencrypt: password encryption is not > > available > > > > As far as I see, there is no option in mount_smbfs to disable password > > "options NETSMBCRYPTO" in kernel configuartion file. > > > encryption, so I'm just stuck, what should I do? > > Thanks in advance. > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2006-January/059823.html Is there a reason this change was made? And is there a reason why NETSMBCRYPTO is not in GENERIC? To me, it seems that breaking smbfs between releases within 6.x violates POLA... I suspect a large number of people (myself included) have always used smbfs for passworded shares and it's "just worked". Moved to stable, where it belongs. Gavinhome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1140606294.59408.8.camel>