Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 18:19:44 +0200 From: Christian Brueffer <brueffer@FreeBSD.org> To: Daniel Gerzo <danger@FreeBSD.org> Cc: "Bruce A. Mah" <bmah@freebsd.org>, src-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, cvs-src@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [src] cvs commit: src/release/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/relnotes/common new.sgml Message-ID: <20060831161944.GC1758@haakonia.hitnet.RWTH-Aachen.DE> In-Reply-To: <60508833.20060831175611@rulez.sk> References: <200608311453.k7VErvIH050852@repoman.freebsd.org> <20060831145406.5900716A613@hub.freebsd.org> <1527203135.20060831171432@rulez.sk> <44F70528.1030100@freebsd.org> <60508833.20060831175611@rulez.sk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--xo44VMWPx7vlQ2+2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 05:56:11PM +0200, Daniel Gerzo wrote: > Hello Bruce, >=20 > Thursday, August 31, 2006, 5:50:00 PM, you wrote: >=20 > > If memory serves me right, Daniel Gerzo wrote: > >> Hello Bruce, > >>=20 > >> Thursday, August 31, 2006, 4:54:06 PM, you wrote: > >>=20 > >>> bmah 2006-08-31 14:53:57 UTC > >>=20 > >>> FreeBSD src repository > >>=20 > >>> Modified files: (Branch: RELENG_5) > >>> release/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/relnotes/common new.sgml=20 > >>=20 > >>> + <para><application>netcat</application> has been updated from the > >>> + version in a 4 February 2005 OpenBSD snapshot to the version > >>> + included in OpenBSD 3.9.</para> > >>> + > >>=20 > >> Maybe it should be better to write it like: > >>=20 > >> netcat has been updated from the version included in OpenBSD snapshot > >> as of February 4th 2005 to the version included in OpenBSD 3.9. ? >=20 > > Hey Daniel-- >=20 > > I think that what I wrote is grammatically correct, in that "4 February > > 2005" modifies "OpenBSD snapshot". I don't have any objections if you > > want to change it, although in your text you should probably do s/in > > OpenBSD snapshot/in an OpenBSD snapshot/. Also I personally don't write > > dates as "February 4th 2005" but I'm probably not the right person to > > wave the consistency banner either. :-) >=20 > I would say that writing 4 February 2006 is not really correct anyway > :-) >=20 That format is perfectly valid. - Christian --=20 Christian Brueffer chris@unixpages.org brueffer@FreeBSD.org GPG Key: http://people.freebsd.org/~brueffer/brueffer.key.asc GPG Fingerprint: A5C8 2099 19FF AACA F41B B29B 6C76 178C A0ED 982D --xo44VMWPx7vlQ2+2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFE9wwgbHYXjKDtmC0RAoEcAKC1CO3TNersXtwB9iZ9wV98V6WxlACggfMM KMtYA+KY04sFeWfyLD1Cktw= =Mvg5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --xo44VMWPx7vlQ2+2--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060831161944.GC1758>