Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2001 01:25:35 +0100 (CET) From: toor@eboa.com To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Subject: docs/24364: I don't think so! Message-ID: <200101160025.f0G0PZW71066@nl.nisser.com>
index | next in thread | raw e-mail
>Number: 24364 >Category: docs >Synopsis: wrong description or rc.conf >Confidential: no >Severity: non-critical >Priority: low >Responsible: freebsd-doc >State: open >Quarter: >Keywords: >Date-Required: >Class: doc-bug >Submitter-Id: current-users >Arrival-Date: Mon Jan 15 16:30:01 PST 2001 >Closed-Date: >Last-Modified: >Originator: Bourne-again Superuser >Release: FreeBSD 4.2-RELEASE i386 >Organization: eBOA/Nisser >Environment: see release >Description: http://www.freebsd.org/handbook/securing-freebsd.html: "FreeBSD now defaults to running ntalkd, comsat, and finger in a sandbox. Another program which may be a candidate for running in a sandbox is named(8). The default rc.conf includes the arguments necessary to run named in a sandbox in a commented-out form. Depending on whether you are installing a new system or upgrading" No it doesn't. O'Reilly's does, though. >How-To-Repeat: check rc.conf >Fix: either amend rc.conf or the docs Mind you, it could be I'm missing something. But if that's the case, blame the docs ;). >Release-Note: >Audit-Trail: >Unformatted: To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the messagehelp
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200101160025.f0G0PZW71066>